Last week we got the closed price at 958 Rosecrans
($650k), the first of "Two New REOs
" mentioned here in early May. (See "Tree Section Closings
Now the companion (from that story) has closed.543 24th
(3br/2ba, 1225 sq. ft.) (pictured)
was offered as-is,
and that meant a cottage that was pretty original (early 1950s) and pretty dark. The lot size (3640 sq. ft.) was decent for the gaslight area.
The bank put this one up at $891k
, accidentally under-pricing the property.
Closed price, after several offers: $1.080m (+$189k/+21%
over the start).
That still seems low, as we write. So bravo to the buyers.
The most immediate reference point has to be a home around the corner, 539 23rd
– a little bit spiffier and larger (4br/3ba, 1900 sq. ft.) home of similar vintage – which went for $1.330m
in late February.
Sure, 24th is smaller and less livable, but what does this sale say about lot values?Worth noting:
The bank took back 543 24th for $978k
in February. Though they priced it low when offering it for sale, they got $100k more.
However, the original suggested minimum bid at auction in December was $1.256m. That's a reflection of the debts owed, not necessarily the market price.
Bottom line: This REO was resolved quickly by means of a low-priced, multiple-offer sale. This is characteristic of REOs, and also a fantastic method of price discovery. All the better if the buyers come out thinking they have scored, and we tend to agree.