Full Desktop Version
All Manhattan Beach Homes for Sale
Search Active Listings
Search Manhattan Beach Homes
Other Neighborhoods and Categories
Newest Listings (All Manhattan Beach)
Sand Section Townhomes
American Martyrs Area
Homes on The Strand
West of Highland
Manhattan Village (Gated)
West of Sepulveda Only
East of Sepulveda Only
Homes Under $2M
Luxury Homes ($4M+)
MB Income Properties
MB Rentals (Via MLS)
Other South Bay
The MB Dashboard
Get an Instant Market Update
Manhattan Beach Market Updates
Latest Inventory Report
Latest Pending/Sold Report
Recent Home Sales by Area (5+ Years of Data)
All Areas of Manhattan Beach
Sand Section (SFRs)
Sand Section (Townhomes)
East Manhattan (SFRs)
East Manhattan (TH/condos)
Useful Tools & Links
More South Bay Real Estate
City of MB Property Info
LA County Assessor
Manhattan Beach Schools
Other Tools & Useful Links
Local Rental Resources (MLS search, other rental sites)
Manhattan Beach Property Taxes
NY Times Rent/Buy Calculator
Hermosa Beach Homes (off-site)
Redondo Beach Homes (off-site)
Palos Verdes Area Homes (off-site)
Zillow's MB Page
Buying or Selling in Manhattan Beach?
We Can Help!
About Dave Fratello
About MB Confidential
What Happy Clients Say
Edge Real Estate
Newbies Slipping in the Trees
| April 28th, 2008
We're seeing the bar being lowered time and again as new homes sell in the Tree Section.
New case in point:
. This one hit the market last Spring (in May) at a time when a moribund market had hit an unexpected patch of new enthusiasm.
The listing began at what seemed like a lower-end price at the time for new construction:
. But the buyers that were out were picky, and virtually any excuse was good enough to pass on a home – a Pacific location being an obvious strike.
So 2309 Pacific hung around. And hung. Around.
It was staged, then un-staged. It was re-listed.
As the months passed, the action finally happened only after a recent, seemingly reluctant price chop to
But oh, what action.
A buyer swooped in at that point and said something like, "nice enough house, nice new price cut, now take
another $200k off now
and we're in." And soon a deal was inked.
The home closed for
last Friday. It's a new (recent) low for new construction in the Tree Section. We're now under $1.9m, when recently seeing new homes sell below $2m was news.
Here are some recent sales (last 6 months) in order of their closings with their drops from initial asking:
We also note that one new home was recently
for sale below 2309 Pacific's closed price, but it has canceled.
had begun at $1.999m last November, and was last at
. (We're assuming it's rented but we don't have info yet.)
Above, we have selected sales that exemplified the recent trend toward substantially lower sale prices, including cuts below $2m. Sizes ranged from 3200-3600 sq. ft. We'll cover the rest in a moment.
There was some argument when 2807 Elm first sold in December 2007 as to whether it was a bellwether or an anomaly. Now it appears that it was, in fact, the leading edge of a trend toward lower sale prices for new homes. Its
price was exceeded only twice in the subsequent 5 sales (from this list), though not by much ($625/PSF being the highest, on 1901 Poinsettia).
In the same span of time, here are the other closed sales of new homes in the Trees:
(pre-market sale off MLS)
Most of these are higher-end sales that don't tell us as much about the fate of smaller, less-well-located new homes that have been the majority of sales and which continue to dominate the lingering inventory.
2100 Flournoy is the rose in this group of sales, a home only a bit bigger than the standard 3200 sq. ft. Tree Section home at 3600 sq. ft. That home netted the highest PPSF of new homes offered on the open market (
Here's a theory:
Quality construction in a nice location will still fare well, even if the builder does have to reduce his ambitions.
2612 Poinsettia is an outlier because, while tax records do show
($687/PSF) as the closed price, the property appears to have been purchased partly in exchange for a Torrance property that went to the builder. That complicates an exact valuation.
So where does this discussion leave us?
The leftover twin of 2309 Pacific,
, would appear to be in deep trouble. It began at $2.495m last year, and cut to
after Pacific went into escrow. Its location is plainly superior to its now-sold twin, but can you really say it's
better, as the current price implies?
Two other twins,
), each offered for more than 250 days, face some price pressure as well. It would not be a surprise, given recent activity, to see one go for close to $2m, or under.
There are several more new homes of comparable size (3200-3400 sq. ft.), many newer to the market, currently priced between $2.3m-$2.7m. As always, there are adjustments to make for location, build quality, etc., but as the bottom moves down, so, too, do the higher-end properties.
Please see our