In a trilogy, sometimes you get a different ending than you expected.
Over at 224 34th, we have yet another 2006 purchase that's hoping for a 2011 sale.
It's the third 2006 purchase we've covered this week, with 2 others being recent closed sales that came in 24% and 43% (yikes!) below their 2006 acquisition…
In a trilogy, sometimes you get a different ending than you expected.

Over at 224 34th, we have yet another 2006 purchase that's hoping for a 2011 sale.
It's the third 2006 purchase we've covered this week, with 2 others being recent closed sales that came in 24% and 43% (yikes!) below their 2006 acquisition prices.
But at 224 34th, the sellers are thinking they've got a different story to tell.
Let's stipulate that this El Norte walkstreet home is big (4br/4ba, 3700 sq. ft.) and beautiful, thanks to a fairly recent remodel ("built by a perfectionist and impeccably maintained," per the listing). The ocean views are significant. (The listing pics are good, too – you notice the difference when someone puts in the effort.)
The main question we'll confront here – before a more detailed review for "Weekend Opens" tomorrow – is simply this: Can they get their 2006 price in a resale this year?
224 34th last traded off-market, back in Sept. 2006, for a price of... well, have you got a minute?
The buyers paid $2.925m, of that we're sure. Public records say so.
The MLS will tell you now that the home sold for $3.0m. That's because there were no buyer's agent commissions paid in '06. What would have been $75k in costs of sale/purchase were magically eliminated, but the MLS-reported value of the transaction still reflected the hypothetical doling-out of those commissions.
So, you see, the real price was $3.0m, less the altruistic contribution of whoever repped the buyer. (You want that person on speed-dial? Sorry, we don't see a name anywhere. We might guess it was the buyer or a family member, but you never know.)
We've been maddened by this price-inflation tactic before (see "The Mystery of 2310 Palm"), but let's put that aside for now.
OK, $2.925m, $3.0m, regardless – today's price is about the same: $2.999m to start.
Have El Norte walkstreets been immune from the hammer of the local RE decline in 2007-09?
Look basically across the street for one answer.
221 34th (5br/5ba, 4200 sq. ft.) (pictured) was new construction in 2008 that wound up as MBC's deal of the year after a buyer grabbed the home, which launched at $5.4m, for $3.315m. (The deal closed in Jan. 2009.)
And then there's the neighbor to the subject property here, the Porsche party house.
228 34th (4br/4ba, 3450 sq. ft.), a pretty big remodel which launched in Sept. 2008 with a fanciful request for $3.999m, dropped to $3.6m with a "free" Porsche 911 convertible to be thrown in (value up to $145k), and quit this past Halloween at $2.999m. (More than 2 years on market.)
We're not saying either home is better or worse than 224 34th – just that there have been issues on the block.
Ocean views and a cool walkstreet in the heart of El Norte – did you know they're moving Sharkeez right up near the top of the block? – certainly will distinguish 224 34th from the location-challenged sales we focused on earlier this week.
But 2006 in 2011? That'd be quite a feat.
Please see our blog disclaimer.
Listings presented above are supplied via the MLS and are brokered by a variety of agents and firms, not Dave Fratello or Edge Real Estate Agency, unless so stated with the listing. Images and links to properties above lead to a full MLS display of information, including home details, lot size, all photos, and listing broker and agent information and contact information.
Based on information from California Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. as of March 30th, 2023 at 11:33am PDT. This information is for your personal, non-commercial use and may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties you may be interested in purchasing. Display of MLS data is usually deemed reliable but is NOT guaranteed accurate by the MLS. Buyers are responsible for verifying the accuracy of all information and should investigate the data themselves or retain appropriate professionals. Information from sources other than the Listing Agent may have been included in the MLS data. Unless otherwise specified in writing, Broker/Agent has not and will not verify any information obtained from other sources. The Broker/Agent providing the information contained herein may or may not have been the Listing and/or Selling Agent.