Renting Can Cost You, Part II

By Dave Fratello | October 7th, 2009
Not so long ago, MBC featured the case of 2909 Elm (5br/4ba, 3450 sq. ft.) which had been vastly overpriced before renting out in 2007, perhaps hoping for a market turnaround. (See "Renting Could Cost You $300k.")

There was no market upsurge after Summer 2007. Instead, the home later sold for $575k less than the price on it when it had quit in June of that year. (Closed price: $1.450m in April this year.) 

Now a nearly new (2008) home that came out in Spring 2008 at $1.995m is back about $300k lighter. It's 2901 Oak (5br/5ba, 3250 sq. ft.), starting Weds. at $1.699m.

The home spent almost 3 months on market last year – always at $1.995m – and appeared to have a deal at one point in August 2008, but the escrow seems to have failed. Since the property's been off-market since then, we take it that it rented out instead.

Asking $2m for an Oak property last year was pushing it a bit. However, after 2901 Oak quit, 3109 Oak came out even higher in October – $2.329m.

After 6 months of sliding downwards, 3109 made a deal at $1.660m (-$669k/-29%), closing in June of this year.

That deal and another Oak sale from earlier this year – a custom Spanish at 1825 Oak (4br/4ba, 3136 sq. ft.) that sold for $1.679m in August – lend support the new price at 2901. But you wonder what they might have gotten if priced right last year, instead of waiting till now.

Please see our blog disclaimer.

Latest Listings Among
Manhattan Beach Homes For Sale