A couple of properties have hit (or "re-hit") the MLS with the old quickie-relist tactic this past week. Do they feel new?
Meantime, another listing from last year is back this year, lease having expired, looking for a nice markup this year – even though they couldn't sell last year.
We welcome these listings back – though 2 never left – and wonder what may become of them.
It's of special note that they're making these moves in late October. Not exactly a hot time in a normal market. Will we see these listings continue into next year?1030 1st
(5br/5ba, 4300 sq. ft.) is a mid-90s Mediterranean built into a very favorable position high up the hill.
In our July review
, we referred to the "huge, huge PV & ocean views, made possible as the hill drops down and away to the south."
But we also pointed to some concerns over the upside-down layout, uneven upgrades to this 90s house, and difficult yard access.
The listing began at $3.295m
, ran 77 DOM and quit in late September.
It was back this weekend after a 3-week break. Back at the same price, though with a different agent.
Different results? TBD. 1826 Marine
(3br/2ba, 1400 sq. ft.) is one we called
a "nicely remodeled" house that could work as an entry-level home or for "some investor to make it a perfectly nice rental."
Location looms large here, just several doors west of Aviation Blvd. in further East MB and along busy Marine. (The listing memorably [still] says, "Marine is quieter than you think... don't let the address fool you!")
This one began not so long ago (late August) at $805k
. It ran 6 weeks (43 DOM), trimmed down to $779k
, then quit... and was back.
The "old" listing was gone and was replaced 25 minutes later by a "new" listing – same price, same agent.
This bumps it up on the "what's new" radar, but there ain't much else new.3204 Poinsettia
(3br/2ba, 1750 sq. ft.) is worth another mention in this context.
As we noted just this past weekend
, it's "a sharply remodeled Tree Section house with a recent history of not selling."
Last year, even $1.299m
couldn't get it sold. The house rented out instead.
This year, now that the renters have left, it's back quite a bit higher at $1.489m (+15%).
Sure, they came back this year into an environment that feels categorically different. But 15% different?
This one could be one of those "soft" indicators to watch.
Our median price is up 4% west of Sepulveda
from last year, so the 15% doesn't make sense in that context. But demand is probably stronger than last year, so how do those trends tie together on a property that failed to transact just last year? As we said, one to watch.